Legal Opinion
Hartung v. Hilda Miller, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 28, 1943No. 8365PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDGERTON, Associate Justice.
On October 14, 1941, appellant and her husband sold to appellee’s assignor, for the benefit of a corporation to be formed, a furniture business on Upshur Street in Washington, D. C. In the contract of sale, the sellers agreed “that the corporation to be formed *• * * shall have the exclusive right to use the name Hilda Miller, Inc. and * * * that they will neither jointly nor severally engage in the furniture business under either of their said names nor any other name within the District of Columbia on or before October 9, 1951.” Appellant soon opened a furniture…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Erikson v. HawleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
- Richards v. ShipleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Allison v. SeigleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1935
- Godfrey v. RoessleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United Rentals (North America), Inc. v. Jerry Keizer, Grant Rent-All, Inc. And Mulder's Outdoor Power Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Deutsch v. BarskyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Bowles v. LeitholdCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Saul v. ThalisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1957
- Chemical Fireproofing Corp. v. KrouseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.