Legal Opinion
Deutsch v. Barsky
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 11, 2002No. 00-CV-114, 00-CV-168PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, Associate Judge:
This case involves the validity of a covenant not to compete which is set forth in an agreement between two dentists, appellants/cross-appellees Dr. Daniel Deutsch and Daniel J. Deutsch. D.D.S., P.C. (collectively, “Dr.Deutsch”), and appel-lee/cross-appellant Dr. Stephen Barsky, who in effect ended their “partnership.” After determining that the contract damages flowing from the breach of the covenant could not be ascertained, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Dr. Barsky on the ground that the covenant not to compete was unreasonable and unenforceable.
O…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Valley Medical Specialists v. FarberArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- Karlin v. WeinbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Reddy v. Community Health Foundation of ManWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- Ellis v. James v. Hurson Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Mercer Management Consulting, Inc. v. WildeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Dyer v. BilaalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Blodgett v. University ClubDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Akassy v. William Penn Apartments Ltd. PartnershipDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Hospitality Staffing Solutions, LLC v. ReyesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Robert Half Int'l Inc. v. BillinghamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.