Legal Opinion
Bowles v. Leithold
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 27, 1945No. 8980PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
Only one question is involved in this appeal. That one question is rather important. The defendants violated the record-keeping provisions of GMPR1 and action *125was brought pursuant to the Price Control Act.2 They failed for twenty-seven months after the Regulation became effective to provide the Price Administrator with the information required from them as manufacturers of certain types of women’s underwear. The information was furnished only after this suit had been begun, but was given prior to the date of hearing. The District Judge enjoined the defendants from…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Regal Knitwear Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- May Department Stores Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Manville Corp. v. Equity Security Holders Committee (In Re Johns-Manville Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Bowles v. Mannie & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
- F. & M. SCHAEFER CORP. v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Woods, Housing Expediter v. WolfeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Creedon v. StrattonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.