Richards v. Shipley
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 365, Jan. T., 1916, by defendant, from decree of C. P. No: 3, Philadelphia Co., March T., 1916, No. 1259, continuing an injunction, in case of J. Ernest Richards, Howard F. Hansell, Jr., F. Wilson Prichett and George" B. Newton Goal Company, a corporation v. Walter C. Shipley. Bill in equity for an injunction. Davis, J., filed the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: FINDINGS of fact.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 365, Jan. T., 1916, by defendant, from decree of C. P. No: 3, Philadelphia Co., March T., 1916, No. 1259, continuing an injunction, in case of J. Ernest Richards, Howard F. Hansell, Jr., F. Wilson Prichett and George" B. Newton Goal Company, a corporation v. Walter C. Shipley. Bill in equity for an injunction. Davis, J., filed the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: FINDINGS of fact. Upon the bill, answer and proofs the following facts are found: 1. The plaintiff, George B. Newton Coal Company, is a Pennsylvania corporation chartered September 4,1912, under the name…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
This appeal is dismissed on the facts found and the legal conclusions reached by the learned chancellor below and on his discussion of the questions involved.
Decree affirmed at appellant’s costs.
2Cited by9 opinions
- Brown v. ChildersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
- Checket-Columbia Co. v. LipmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Etna Forge & Bolt Co. v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
- Fisher v. HagerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Hartung v. Hilda Miller, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.