Legal Opinion

Chemical Fireproofing Corp. v. Krouse

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 27, 1946No. 9148PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Associate Justice.

Appellant here, plaintiff below, is seeking a reversal of that part of a District Court order which held invalid a provision of an employment contract between appellant and appellee which aimed at precluding appellee, for a period of three years, from engaging, as a competitor, in the solicitation of appellant’s customers.

The facts of the case are virtually uncontested. Appellant employed appellee, defendant below, under a written contract dated October 27, 1943, containing, among other items, the following provision:

“(4) As a consideration for this employment…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Oregon Steam Navigation Co. v. WinsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Harrison v. Glucose Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902
  3. Eureka Laundry Co. v. LongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Freudenthal v. EspeySupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  5. Heinz v. National Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ellis v. James v. Hurson Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Deutsch v. BarskyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Kutka v. Temporaries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
  4. Saul v. ThalisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1957
  5. Ellis v. James v. Hurson Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API