Legal Opinion

State v. Stroud

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 2005No. CR-04-0234-PRPublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERCH, Justice.

¶ 1 We are asked to resolve whether a conviction for the crime of escape is sustainable under the facts of this case. We conclude that sufficient evidence supports the jury’s verdict and therefore reinstate the conviction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Article 6, Section 5(3) of the Arizona Constitution, and Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 12-120.24 (2003).

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Bisbee Police Officer William Silva saw Defendant Sudden Rio Stroud sitting in a car. Knowing that there was an outstanding felony warrant for Stroud’s arrest, Officer…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Medford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. State v. GendronArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. MathersArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Hutcherson v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Christopher Mathew PayneArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  2. McCoy v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
  3. State of Arizona v. Dale Shawn HausnerArizona Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. CoxArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API