Legal Opinion

Memmer v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 10, 2015No. 14-135LPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rails-to-Trails; Fifth Amendment Taking; Conveying Easements Under Indiana Law; Recreational Trails Beyond the Scope of Railroad Purposes Easements; No Trail Use Agreement Executed; Expiration of NITU; Failure to Consummate Abandonment; Offer of Financial Assistance

OPINION AND ORDER

SWEENEY, Judge

In this Rails-to-Trails case, plaintiffs own real property adjacent to railroad rights-of-way in southwestern Indiana. They contend that the United States violated the Just Compensation Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution by authorizing the conversion of the railroad…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Caldwell, Iii v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  4. Preseault v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  5. Barclay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. James v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  2. Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  3. Harley-White v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. Butler v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  5. Memmer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API