Legal Opinion
Barclay v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 11, 2006No. 2005-1255PublishedCited by 118 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge DYK.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.
DYK, Circuit Judge.
The United States District Court for the District of Kansas and the Court of Federal Claims dismissed several landowners’ Fifth Amendment takings claims challenging the operation of the National Trail Systems Act (the “Trails Act”), 16 U.S.C. § 1247(d). Barclay, et al. v. United States, 351 F.Supp.2d 1169 (D.Kan.2004); Renewal Body Works, Inc. v. United States, 64 Fed.Cl. 609 (2005). Applying our decision in Caldwell v. United States, 391 F.3d 1226 (Fed.Cir.2004), cert. denied…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Kalo Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- Hill-Rom Services, Inc. v. Stryker CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Hall v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Wbip, LLC v. Kohler Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Wordtech Systems, Inc. v. Integrated Networks Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Ladd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.