Brown v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Rails-to-Trails; Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Resolution of Appeal in Another Case; Legal Standard
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge.
In this case, plaintiffs own real property in Cleveland County, North Carolina, adjacent to a railroad right-of-way. They contend that the United States, by authorizing the conversion of the railroad right-of-way into a recreational trail pursuant to the National Trail Systems Act (“Trails Act”), took their property without paying just compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. In furtherance of their claim for just…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Monbo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025