Legal Opinion

Farmer-Lanctot v. Shand

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 14, 2018No. AC39817PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElgo, J.

In this negligence action, the plaintiff, Ellen Farmer-Lanctot, appeals from the judgment rendered on a general verdict in favor of the defendant, Matthew Shand. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly denied the plaintiff's request for a jury charge on (1) the sudden emergency doctrine, (2) the standard of care for a pedestrian in a roadway, and (3) the defendant's duty to yield to pedestrians when making a right-hand turn. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the trial court.

On the basis of the evidence presented at trial, the jury reasonably could…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dowling v. Finley Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  2. Colucci v. PinetteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Opotzner v. BassConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. Bicio v. BrewerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  5. Cuartas v. Town of GreenwichConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Allen v. Shoppes at Buckland Hills, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  2. Walencewicz v. Jealous Monk, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
  3. Zhuleku v. Naugatuck Valley Radiology AssociatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
  4. Klein v. Quinnipiac UniversityConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  5. Vaicunas v. GaylordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API