Legal Opinion

Henriques v. Magnavice

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 15, 2000No. AC 19822PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PELLEGRINO, J.

The defendant state of Connecticut (state) appeals from the judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff in a claim for personal injury arising from a motor vehicle collision. The state claims that the trial court improperly refused to submit its apportionment complaint to the jury. We agree with the state and reverse the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our resolution of this appeal. In September, 1996, *335the plaintiff suffered personal injuries in an automobile accident caused when a motor vehicle owned by the state and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  2. Fogarty v. RashawSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. Stewart v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. Doe v. ManheimerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Smith v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. Boretti v. Panacea Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Bonan v. Goldring Home Inspections, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. Bostic v. SoucyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  5. Massad v. Eastern Connecticut Cable Television, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API