Legal Opinion
Coleman v. Napolitano
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 14, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2012-1352PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge
This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or, in the alternative, for summary judgment under Rule 56. Plaintiff, James E. Coleman, has charged his employer, the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), with violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”). DHS argues that none of Mr. Coleman’s claims has merit. After careful consideration of the parties’ papers, the relevant…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Greer v. Board of Trustees University of District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Mount v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- James Coleman v. Elaine C. DukeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Duncan v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Lapera v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.