Legal Opinion

Brafford v. Cook

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 22, 1950No. 525PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

It would seem that the trial court was influenced by the ■defendant’s evidence in sustaining his demurrer and entering a compulsory nonsuit. However, as the defendant’s evidence is in direct conflict with the evidence of the plaintiff, its credibility is for the jury and it is not to be considered by the court on motion for involuntary nonsuit. Jackson v. Hodges, Comr., ante, 694; Graham v. Gas Co., 231 N.C. 680.

For present purposes, the plaintiff’s evidence is to be taken as true, and he is entitled to every reasonable intendment and legitimate inference fairly deducible therefrom. Howard v.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Graham v. North Carolina Butane Gas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Lincoln v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Shell v. . RosemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Tarrant Ex Rel. Tarrant v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Steelman v. . BenfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Watters Ex Rel. Watters v. ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Matheny v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Donlop v. SnyderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Journigan v. Little River Ice Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Morrisette v. A. G. Boone Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API