Journigan v. Little River Ice Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
Three separate questions are presented for decision in the appeals herein.
First. Plaintiff’s Appeal in No. C-6256 —Alice Journigan Case:
In the face of the admission that Alice Journigan has not in fact qualified as administratrix of Genie M. Journigan’s estate and that no personal representative has ever been appointed to administer thereon, it is difficult to perceive how Alice Journigan finds any ground upon which to stand as an appellant. She denominates herself on appeal as “The plaintiff,” but there is no such plaintiff as “Alice Journigan, administratrix of Genie M. Journigan,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Reynolds v. Lloyd Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Brown v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Jeremiah M. Kesler v. . William A. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
- Carpenter v. Asheville Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Hall v. Southern R. R. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Graves v. WelbornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Burcl v. North Carolina Baptist Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Bryant v. WoodliefSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Lamm v. LorbacherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Hinson v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.