Legal Opinion

Donlop v. Snyder

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 12, 1951No. 666PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The only exceptions brought forward on this appeal relate to the refusal of the trial court to allow the defendant’s motion for nonsuit made at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence and renewed at the close of all the evidence.

The defendant contends the motion for nonsuit should have been allowed for the reasons (1) that the evidence fails to make out a prima facie case of actionable negligence against the defendant, but (2) if so, that the plaintiff’s evidence establishes contributory negligence as a matter of law.

In determining the questions thus presented the rule is that the evidence…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Thomas v. Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Beck v. HooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Beck v. . HooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Maddox v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Childress v. Johnson Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Hood v. Queen City Coach CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Price v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Blevins v. FranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Morrisette v. A. G. Boone Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API