Enter v. Crutcher
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
159 Cal.App.2d Supp. 841 (1958)
MERCEDES ENTER, Respondent,
v.
LEE CRUTCHER, Appellant.
California Court of Appeals.
Mar. 18, 1958.
Myers, Martin & Leedy for Appellant.
Ray H. Enter for Respondent.
DAVID, J.
This action is brought upon two accepted bills of exchange upon which the defendant was both drawer and acceptor, directing plaintiff's assignor, upon acceptance, to charge the sums so due to defendant's account, in accordance with the advices of the defendant. The acceptances were executed in the city of San Jose, Costa Rica. No place of presentment or payment was specified in the documents in…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Hale v. BohannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Franklin v. Nat C. Goldstone AgencyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Lesker CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Dunn v. MullanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bullock v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- People v. CarusoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Star Motor Imports, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Arc Investment Co. v. TiffithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Burt v. ScarboroughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.