Legal Opinion
Böhler-Uddeholm Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided November 14, 1996No. Slip Op. No. 96-184. Court No. 95-08-01024PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RESTANI, Judge:
This case is before the court on plaintiff Bohler-Uddeholm Corporation’s (“Bohler-Uddeholm”) Rule 56.2 motion for judgment upon the agency record. Bohler-Uddeholm filed this action challenging the defendant United States Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) antidumping findings 1 that flat rolled and forged UHB Stavax (“Stavax”) and UHB Ramax 2 (“Ramax”) are within the “class or kind of merchandise” covered by the antidumping finding issued in Stainless Steel Plate from Sweden, 38 Fed.Reg. 15,079, 15,079 (Treas. Dep’t 1973). Bohler-Uddeholm contends that Commerce’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Frisco Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Diversified Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- United States v. Carborundum Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- Mitsubishi Electric Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Böhler-Uddeholm Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Böhler-Uddeholm Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Böhler-Uddeholm Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Böhler-Uddeholm Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Clearon Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.