Kubie v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge
Tankage, .that is to say, the product remaining after extracting certain substances from slaughterhouse refuse, was classified by the collector of customs at the port of New York as a nonenumerated manufactured article and assessed for duty at 15 per cent ad valorem under that part of paragraph 385 of the tariff act of 1913 which reads as follows:
Par. 385. That there shall be levied, collected and paid * * * on all articles manufactured, in whole or in part, not provided for in this section, a duty of 15 per centum ad valorem.
*469The importers protested that the merchandise was not a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Magone v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Klipstein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- Stone v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
- Greatrex, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
- Kroder Reubel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- Novelty Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.