Legal Opinion

Vale v. Louisiana

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 22, 1970No. 727PublishedCited by 906 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart

The appellant, Donald Vale, was convicted in a Louisiana court on a charge of possessing heroin and was sentenced as a multiple offender to 15 years’ imprisonment at hard labor. The Louisiana Supreme Court affirmed the conviction, rejecting the claim that evidence introduced at the trial was the product of an unlawful search and seizure. 252 La. 1056, 215 So. 2d 811. We granted Vale’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, postponed consideration of the question of jurisdiction to the hearing of the case on the merits, and limited review to the search-and-seizure question. 396 U. S. 813.*

The…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by906 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Segura v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

901 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API