Legal Opinion

Flood v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 2007No. 06-126, 06-127PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Justice.

[T1] After conditionally pleading guilty to two controlled substances offenses, Mr. Flood challenges the district court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence discovered during a search of the vehicle he was driving. He maintains that he was detained in violation of his constitutional rights. Concluding the highway patrol trooper did not exceed the seope of permissible detention while issuing traffic tickets to him and his passenger, who was the owner of the car, and that the officer had reasonable suspicion to justify detaining Mr. Flood after the original purpose of the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States of America, -Appellee v. William G. WestCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Feeney v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Lovato v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Rodriguez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  5. WyoLaw, LLC v. State of Wyoming, Office of the Attorney General, Consumer Protection UnitWyoming Supreme Court · 2021

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API