Legal Opinion
Yancy v. Shatzer
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 16, 2004No. CC 0008-08313; CA A114776; SC S50280PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*347DE MUNIZ, J.
Portland police stopped petitioner Yancy for jaywalking. In the course of that contact, the police searched petitioner and discovered less than an ounce of marijuana. The police then issued petitioner a citation that excluded him from two Portland city parks for a period of 30 days. Petitioner timely appealed to the City of Portland Hearings Officer, which affirmed the exclusion. After the exclusion period had run, petitioner sought to challenge the exclusion citation by means of a writ of review in circuit court. The circuit court rejected petitioner’s arguments on the merits.…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- Kellas v. Department of CorrectionsOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Corey v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. MillsOregon Supreme Court · 2013
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.