Legal Opinion

Minish v. Hanuman Fellowship

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 31, 2013No. H035737PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUSHING, R J.

I. Statement of the Case

Plaintiff Diane Marie Minish filed an action against the Hanuman Fellowship (Hanuman), Mount Madonna Institute, and the Mount Madonna Center seeking compensatory and punitive damages for personal injuries and other losses she sustained when she fell off a forklift allegedly due to defendants’ negligence. Defendants answered, and as an affirmative defense alleged that plaintiff was covered by workers’ compensation which provided her exclusive remedy. Defendants later sought summary judgment on that ground, and plaintiff sought summary adjudication…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Douglass v. Serenivision, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Hearn Pacific Corp. v. Second Generation Roofing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Upshaw v. Superior Court of Alameda Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. San Miguel Community Ass'n v. State Farm General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Hollingsworth v. Superior Court, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API