Legal Opinion
San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District v. General Reinsurance Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 24, 2015No. Case No. 14-cv-01866-JSCPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION RE: PHASE ONE BENCH TRIAL
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, United States Magistrate Judge
Defendant General Reinsurance Corporation (“General Reinsurance”) issued an excess insurance policy to Plaintiff San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (“BART”), which is a self-insured employer for workers’ compensation. This dispute arisés out of a multiple myeloma workers’ compensation claim of a former BART employee, Michael Gonsolin (“Gonsolin”), which BART settled with Gonsolin before the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (“WC Appeals Board”). BART contends that General Reinsurance is…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Lance v. DennisSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Eric Noel v. Brian C. Hall Sandra A. Hall, Fka Sandra Johnson, and Gabrielle S. Lennartz Herb Weisser Michelle A. MerchantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- San Diego Cnty. Sch. Risk Mgmt. Joint Powers Auth. v. Liberty Ins. Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2018
- Cal. Ins. Guarantee Assn. v. San Diego County Schools etc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- Drakeford v. Capital Benefit, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
- San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District v. National Union Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Scottsdale Insurance Company v. HorowitzDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.