People v. Castillo
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GEORGE, C. J.
We granted review to determine whether the Court of Appeal erred by modifying the term of appellant’s civil commitment as a sexually violent predator from two years—the term agreed to by the Los Angeles County District Attorney, the Los Angeles County Public Defender, and the Presiding Judge of the Los Angeles County Superior Court, pursuant to a signed stipulation—to an indeterminate term, as provided by Proposition 83’s amendments to Welfare and Institutions Code section 6604. We reverse the judgment rendered by the Court of Appeal, and enforce the stipulation.
I
A
In 1985,…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- People v. DungoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. TateCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. VoitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Minish v. Hanuman FellowshipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.