Legal Opinion

State v. Wright

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 4, 1976No. 7520SC773PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

The defendant assigns as error the failure of the trial court to instruct the jury “on the law of a shooting by accident or misadventure” and the failure of the court “to state the defendant’s evidence on a shooting by accident or misadventure to an extent necessary to explain the application of the law thereto.”

Every “substantial feature” of the case arising on the evidence must be presented to the jury even without a special request for instructions on the issue. State v. Dooley, 285 N.C. 158, 203 S.E. 2d 815 (1974); State v. Hickman, 21 N.C. App. 421, 204 S.E. 2d 718 (1974).…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DooleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. HickmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. FloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. State v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. EfirdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. BarbourCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. State v. IngramCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API