Legal Opinion

State v. Best

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1976No. 7615SC453PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the failure of the trial court to charge the jury on the law of shooting by accident or misadventure. Defendant did not request such an instruction.

The trial judge has a duty to “declare and explain the law arising on the evidence given in the case.” G.S. 1-180. Every substantial feature of the case arising on the evidence must be presented to the jury even without a special request for instructions on the issue. State v. Dooley, 285 N.C. 158, 203 S.E. 2d 815 (1974). In a case where the evidence offered by one party tends to show accident, it is not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DooleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. AmbuehlCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
  2. State v. DrewSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  3. State v. EfirdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API