State v. Floyd
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The defendant assigns as error the failure of the Judge to comply with G.S. 1-180, in that he did not state any of the evidence introduced by the defendant, and did not explain the application of the law to the defendant’s evidence.
G.S. 1-180 requires the judge in his charge to the jury to declare, and explain the law arising on the evidence given in the case, but he is not required to state such evidence, except to the extent necessary to explain the application of the law thereto.
Stacy, C. J., speaking for the Court said in S. v. Ardrey, 232 N.C. 721, 62 S.E. 2d 53: “In interpreting this…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. ArdreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- State v. BrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Williams v. Eastern Carolina Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. HardeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. ScaturroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- Ross v. Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, & ExplosivesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- State v. DutchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.