State v. Hickman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, Judge.
The defendant assigns as error the failure of the trial court to chargé on self-defense and the failure of the trial court in its charge to explain and define the element of assault. Under G.S. 1-180 it is the duty of the trial court to declare and explain the law arising from the evidence even without a special request for instruction. The defendant’s evidence, even though contradicted by the State, raised an issue of self-defense. Whether the defendant’s evidence is less credible than the State’s evidence is an issue for the jury, not the trial judge. The failure of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. MundySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. . GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- State v. ChaneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Paul v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
- Toomey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. SpringsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. BlackmonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.