Legal Opinion

State v. Hickman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 1, 1974No. 743SC221PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Judge.

The defendant assigns as error the failure of the trial court to chargé on self-defense and the failure of the trial court in its charge to explain and define the element of assault. Under G.S. 1-180 it is the duty of the trial court to declare and explain the law arising from the evidence even without a special request for instruction. The defendant’s evidence, even though contradicted by the State, raised an issue of self-defense. Whether the defendant’s evidence is less credible than the State’s evidence is an issue for the jury, not the trial judge. The failure of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MundySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. State v. ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. State v. . GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. State v. ChaneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Paul v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
  2. Toomey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. SpringsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. BlackmonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API