Harelson v. South San Joaquin Irrigation District
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County issuing a writ of mandamus. Frank H. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Mandamus. Plaintiff seeks to have his land situated within the boundaries of defendant district excluded therefrom. To this end he filed his petition in due form with the board of directors of defendant district which was denied. Thereupon he complained to the superior court and prayed for a writ of mandamus to compel the said board to make the necessary order excluding his lands from said district. A general demurrer to the complaint was overruled; defendant answered; the cause was tried and plaintiff had findings and judgment as prayed for. The appeal is from this judgment on the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Inglin v. HoppinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Puterbaugh v. WadhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by13 opinions
- Tulare Water Co. v. State Water CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Dufton v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Kings County Water DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Re Harper Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Lorenzino v. State ex rel. JamesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.