Legal Opinion

Geurkink v. City of Petaluma

California Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1896No. S. F. No. 250PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County and from an order refusing a new trial. R. F. Crawford, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

— This is an action for a permanent injunction against the city of Petaluma, brought by two owners of lots abutting upon Eighth and G streets of that city, respectively. Belief was denied them in the trial court, and this appeal comes to us from the judgment, and also from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

The facts material to a consideration of this question may be succinctly stated as follows: Edwards creek has been from time immemorial a natural water channel" passing over Eighth street, and thence across the city to tide water. Some few years past, the city blocked the channel of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Brown v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Bigelow v. BallerinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Foreman v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. James v. YaegerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API