Geurkink v. City of Petaluma
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County and from an order refusing a new trial. R. F. Crawford, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
— This is an action for a permanent injunction against the city of Petaluma, brought by two owners of lots abutting upon Eighth and G streets of that city, respectively. Belief was denied them in the trial court, and this appeal comes to us from the judgment, and also from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
The facts material to a consideration of this question may be succinctly stated as follows: Edwards creek has been from time immemorial a natural water channel" passing over Eighth street, and thence across the city to tide water. Some few years past, the city blocked the channel of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Brown v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Bigelow v. BallerinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Foreman v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- James v. YaegerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by32 opinions
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.