Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Tung Mung Development Co., Ltd. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 22, 2002No. 99-07-00457; 99-07-00457PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALLACH, Judge.

I

Preliminary Statement

Allegheny Ludlum Corporation, Armco, Inc., Butler Armco Independent Union, J & L Specialty Steel Inc., The United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO/CLC, and Zanesville Armco Independent Organization (“Defendant-Intervenors” or “Petitioners”) dispute the United States Department of Commerce International Trade Administration’s (“Commerce” or “the Department”) finding in Commerce’s Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, Tung Mung Development Co. v. United States, 2001 WL 844484 (July 3, 2001) (“Remand Determination”) that the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gerber Food (Yunnan) Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
  2. Tung Mung Development Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  3. Tianjin Magnesium Intern. Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
  4. Xiping Opeck Food Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
  5. Mid Continent Nail Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API