Legal Opinion
Mid Continent Nail Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 30, 2013No. 11-00019PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RIDGWAY, Judge:
In this action, the Plaintiff domestic producer of steel nails Mid Continent Nail Corporation (“Mid Continent”) contests the final results, as amended, of the U.S. Department of Commerce’s first administrative review 1 of the antidumping duty order covering steel nails from, the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”). See Certain Steel Nails From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the First Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 Fed.Reg. 16,379 (March 23, 2011) (“Final Results”); Certain Steel . Nails From the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Husteel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Samsung Electronics Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Fine Furniture (Shanghai ) Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- The Stanley Works (Langfang) Fastening Sys. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.