Legal Opinion
Tianjin Magnesium Intern. Co., Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 9, 2010No. Consol.09-00012PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge.
Plaintiff Tianjin Magnesium International Co., Ltd., (“TMI”) and Defendant Intervenor U.S. Magnesium LLC (“USM”) each move for judgment on the agency record pursuant to USCIT R. 56.2, challenging the final determination of the Department of Commerce (the “Department” or “Commerce”) in Pure Magnesium from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 73 Fed.Reg. 76,336 (Dep’t Commerce Dec. 16, 2008) (“Final Results”).
Plaintiff asserts that Commerce acted arbitrarily, capriciously, and not in accordance with law when it…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Rhone Poulenc, Inc. And Rhone Poulenc Chimie De Base, S.A. v. The United States, Pq CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- Jacobi Carbons AB v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- Fuwei Films (Shandong) Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- Vinh Hoan Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.