Tung Mung Development Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge DYK. Opinion dissenting in part filed by Senior Circuit Judge FRIEDMAN.
DYK, Circuit Judge
This is a consolidated appeal by Allegheny Ludlum Corp., et al. (collectively, “Allegheny”) from two United States Court of International Trade antidumping decisions upholding determinations by the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”).1 We hold that alleged errors in earlier interim decisions by the Court of International Trade,2 setting aside Commerce’s initial determination in each of these two cases and remanding for further proceedings, provide no ground for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Gallant Ocean (Thailand) Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Changshou Wujin Fine Chemical Factory Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Pam, S.P.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Altx, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Mueller Comercial De Mexico, S. De R.L. De C v. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.