Legal Opinion

Tung Mung Development Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided January 15, 2004No. Nos. 03-1073, 03-1095PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge DYK. Opinion dissenting in part filed by Senior Circuit Judge FRIEDMAN.

DYK, Circuit Judge

This is a consolidated appeal by Allegheny Ludlum Corp., et al. (collectively, “Allegheny”) from two United States Court of International Trade antidumping decisions upholding determinations by the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”).1 We hold that alleged errors in earlier interim decisions by the Court of International Trade,2 setting aside Commerce’s initial determination in each of these two cases and remanding for further proceedings, provide no ground for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Gallant Ocean (Thailand) Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  2. Changshou Wujin Fine Chemical Factory Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  3. Pam, S.P.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  4. Altx, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  5. Mueller Comercial De Mexico, S. De R.L. De C v. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API