Barlow v. Barnes
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Plaintiff sued defendant, charging upon two separate causes of action. The first prayed damages for the alienation of the affections of plaintiff’s wife. The second prayed damages for defendant’s criminal intercourse with her. The gravamina of these two actions are of course essentially different. A cause of action for alienation of affection-may exist where there has been no criminal conversation, and, upon the other hand, where criminal conversation is the basis of a right of action, alienation-of the wife’s affection is not a necessary element of the offense. “Her sexual intercourse with…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Evans v. O'ConnorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Colwell v. . TinkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Humphrey v. PopeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Bedan v. TurneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Dalton v. DreggeMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by9 opinions
- Adkins v. BrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Runyon v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Hargraves v. BallouSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1926
- Bourne v. BourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Hirschy v. CoodleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.