Humphrey v. Pope
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County and from an order denying a new trial. W. B. Nutter, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcLAUGHLIN, J.
This is an action for damages caused by the acts of defendant in alienating the affection of plaintiff’s husband, and abducting, persuading, and enticing said husband from plaintiff, and causing him to live separate and apart from her. The facts stated in the complaint are set forth in the decision on a former appeal (Humphrey v. Pope, 122 Cal. 255, [54 Pac. 847]), and hence it is deemed unnecessary to repeat them here. The defendant, answering the complaint, denied each material averment thereof. The cause was tried before a jury, and upon the verdict of the jury a judgment was entered…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Harrison v. Sutter Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- De La Cuesta v. CalkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
- People v. Woon Tuck WoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Adkins v. BrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- People v. SinghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- In Re Estate of PuseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Hewel v. HoginCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Jameson v. TullyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.