Bourne v. Bourne
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.
The plaintiff, Marie Bourne, brought this action against Harry S. Bourne and Hope Bourne, the parents of her husband, Ralph Bourne, to recover damages for the alleged alienation of her husband’s affections. The ease was tried before a jury, and there was a verdict and judgment for twelve thousand five hundred dollars in plaintiff’s favor. The defendants appeal, basing their claim for reversal on insufficiency of the evidence to support a verdict, and error of the court in giving and refusing instructions and in the admission of evidence.
The weak point in plaintiff’s case is insufficiency of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Baustian v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Maupin v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Tucker v. TuckerMississippi Supreme Court · 1896
- Illinois Central Ry. Co. v. HouchinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
- Diamond Rubber Co. v. HarrymanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wallace v. WallaceMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Worth v. WorthWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
- Horowitz v. SacksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Seaborn v. First Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1934
- Tischhauser v. JarvisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.