Dalton v. Dregge
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent. (Adsit, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
This is an action for criminal conversation, in which the plaintiff had verdict and judgment.
The principal question is raised upon the competency of *251the testimony of two of plaintiff’s children to a conversation between their father and mother, in which the mother admitted that she was with the defendant in a room at a hotel two hours. This admission was made in reply to a charge from the husband that she had spent the entire night Avifch the defendant there. It is unnecessary to give the entire conversation, the tendency of which was to show that the wife • had become estranged from the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. DoyleMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ColandroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Luick v. ArendsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
- Barlow v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Mead v. RandallMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. HandleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.