Legal Opinion

Hirschy v. Coodley

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1953No. Civ. 19254PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of dismissal entered on an order sustaining a 'demurrer to the second amended complaint, referred to as the complaint, without leave to amend.

The facts alleged are these: Plaintiff and Charlotte Hirschy are, and at all times pertinent were, husband and wife. Between March 1 and July 21, 1950, while plaintiff and his wife were living together, defendant unlawfully and with intent to injure plaintiff and deprive him of the companionship and affection of his wife, seduced Charlotte and had illicit intercourse with her at various places in Los Angeles…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Carter v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Marshall v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Opitz v. HaydenWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Turner v. HeavrinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Seamons v. SpackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Destafano v. GrabrianColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Jacks v. JacksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Destafano v. GrabrianColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Felsenthal v. McMillanTexas Supreme Court · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API