Legal Opinion

Bedan v. Turney

California Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1893No. 19159PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Action of criminal conversation. Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiff has appealed, assigning certain errors of the court in its instructions to the jury.

The respondent makes a preliminary objection to the consideration of these errors upon the ground that the appeal is taken from the judgment alone, whereas the rulings are only found in a “ bill of exceptions on motion for a new trial.” Section 950 of the Code of Civil Procedure, however, provides that “on an appeal from a final judgment the appellant must furnish the court with a copy of the judgment roll, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bigaouette v. PauletMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  2. Egbert v. GreenwaltMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Hyde v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hart v. KnappSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
  2. Lunnun v. MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  3. Norris v. StonehamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Barlow v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Ohlinger v. RoushWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API