Legal Opinion

Brown v. Patel

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 27, 2007No. 102,402PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMONDSON, V.C.J.

¶ 1 The issues in this appeal are (1) whether a UM insurer may, without either denying or granting a UM claim, seek intervention in the action brought by its insured against the alleged tortfeasor and assert both potential subrogation rights and the defenses raised by of the tortfeasor; and (2) whether a subsequent judgment for the tortfeasor necessarily relieves the UM carrier of any bad-faith liability arising from its handling of the UM claim. We hold that a UM insurer may, in certain cireumstances, intervene in the action brought by its insured against the alleged…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Christian v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  3. Stringfellow v. Concerned Neighbors in ActionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Roger Justice v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Ramona Shump v. Lana Balka, and Wanda Jones, Intervenors-ObjectorsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Oldenkamp v. United American InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  2. Shotts v. GEICOCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  3. Garnett v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  4. Tulsa Industrial Authority v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  5. Yousuf v. CohlmiaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API