Legal Opinion

State ex rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Canady

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1996No. 23269PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORKMAN, Justice.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) seeks to appear in its own name as the plaintiffs uninsurance carrier rather than to defend in the name of the uninsured motorist. In response to the trial court’s adverse ruling on this issue, State Farm seeks a writ of prohibition against The Honorable Herman G. Canady, Judge of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County. Based on our conclusion that West Virginia Code § 33-6-31(d) (Supp.1995) permits State Farm as the uninsurance carrier to appear and defend in its own name, we grant the requested writ of prohibition.

On…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ShraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State Ex Rel. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. MaddenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State Automobile Mutual Insurance v. YoulerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Shamblin v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Fred J. Craft, Irene Craft, and Joanne Craft v. Economy Fire & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Light v. Allstate InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. WallaceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Ellwein v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Miller v. FluhartyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Mitchell v. BroadnaxWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API