Legal Opinion
Angell v. Rowlands
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 16, 1978No. Civ. 41007PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KANE, J.
Facts:
W. Daniel Rowlands 1 was in the market for a house in August 1974. At that time he and his wife owned a home near the City of Santa Rosa (Alpine Road Property). They were looking for a substitute home in the city itself, and were attracted to an open house showing of the home of respondents Mr. and Mrs. Angell (hereafter Hermit Way Property). The Hermit Way Property, held by the Angells in joint tenancy, was listed with the real estate brokerage firm of McClelland and Doherty. Mr. Doherty was active in the negotiations between the Angells and the Rowlands.
On a form…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jackson v. TorrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Cavanaugh v. CasselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Kaneko v. OkudaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Abrams v. MotterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Olson v. LovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Peterson Development Co. v. Torrey Pines BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Fagelbaum & Heller LLP v. SmylieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Skinner v. HaugsethDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Andrade Development Co. v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Rael v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.