Legal Opinion
Doe v. Statewide Grievance Committee
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 11, 1996No. 14174PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying the plaintiffs request for a permanent injunction. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly refused to enjoin the statewide grievance committee (committee) from pro*672ceeding in a matter in which the committee failed to comply with the temporal requirements set forth in General Statutes (Rev. to 1993) § 51-90g and Practice Book § 27J. We conclude that the trial court improperly denied the plaintiffs request to enjoin the committee from taking further action, and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- In Re GriffithsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adams v. RubinowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Heslin v. Connecticut Law Clinic of Trantolo & TrantoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Bridgeport Hospital v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Doe v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Grasso v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Groton Long Point Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Alexander v. Retirement BoardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Doe v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Doe v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997