Legal Opinion
Alexander v. Retirement Board
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 23, 2000No. AC 18844PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUPONT, J.
The plaintiffs2 appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their appeal from the decision of the defendant, the retirement board of the city of Waterbury (retirement board). The court concluded that the retirement board’s decision to impose conditions on the reinstatement of the plaintiff teachers in the Waterbury retirement system (retirement system) was not arbitrary or capricious. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the court improperly failed to find that (1) the retirement board exceeded its power under § 2762 of the code of the city of Waterbury, and (2)…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Karp v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Doe v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Luce v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Golden Hill Paugussett Tribe of Indians v. Town of SouthburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- City of Norwich v. Norwalk Wilbert Vault Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Broadnax v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. BletschSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- O'CONNOR v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- CAS Construction Co. v. Dainty Rubbish Service, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Greene v. City of WaterburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.