Legal Opinion · Dissent

Doe v. Statewide Grievance Committee

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 6, 1997No. 15533Published

1DissentBerdon, J.

The majority concludes that the failure of the defendant, the statewide grievance committee (committee), to comply with the time requirements of General Statutes (Rev. to 1993) § 51-90g (g)1 and Practice Book § 27J (i),2 does not deprive *686the committee of subject matter jurisdiction to act on a grievance complaint alleging attorney misconduct.3 In other words, according to the majority, the committee may permissibly pursue a grievance complaint well beyond the four month time limitation specifically provided in § 51-90g (g). I disagree.

I agree with the majority that we have a special…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Statewide Grievance Committee v. RozbickiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Rosenthal v. State Bar Examining CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  3. Grievance Committee v. TrantoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. Doe v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. Lewis v. MatteoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API