Legal Opinion

Dickson v. Phillips

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1924No. 18798PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This action was brought to bave a deed to certain real estate declared to be a forgery, and set aside and cancelled on that ground, and tbe title quieted *634in appellants as against respondents, and any and all claiming under them. After a trial upon the issues framed by the amended complaint, answers and replies to the affirmative answers, the trial court directed respondents to deliver to appellants a quitclaim deed of the land in controversy, upon the payment by appellants to them of the sum of $487. It was also provided that, in case appellants fail to pay that sum within sixty days,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Easton v. LittooyWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Kucher v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Caughren v. KahanWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Bayley v. ParisWashington Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  2. Haagen v. LandeisWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Haagen v. LandeisWashington Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API