Legal Opinion

Haagen v. Landeis

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1960No. 34730, 34731Published

1Opinion of the Court

56 Wn.2d 289 (1960)

352 P.2d 636

ALEXANDER HAAGEN et al., Appellants,

v.

JAKE LANDEIS et al., Respondents.

ALEXANDER HAAGEN et al., Appellants,

v.

DALE WRIGHT et al., Respondents.[1]

Nos. 34730, 34731.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

June 2, 1960.

OTT, J.

The defendants signed contracts for advertising space with National Business & Property Exchange, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the corporation), and, after the advertisements had been published, refused to pay for them. These actions to recover the contract price were brought by the successors of the corporation. The trial court found that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dallas Farm MacHinery Company v. ReavesTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Bates v. SouthgateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Bowles Co. v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Kelley v. Von HerbergWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Graff v. GeiselWashington Supreme Court · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API