Legal Opinion · Dissent

Haagen v. Landeis

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1960No. 34730, 34731Published

1DissentFinley, J.

(dissenting) — Following the lead of the majority, I, too, shall limit my discussion to the Landeis case, and hereinafter shall refer to Mr. and Mrs. Landeis as the respondents. It is undisputed that, on February 29, 1956, respondents signed the written document set forth verbatim in the majority opinion and denominated “Display Advertising Agreement.” On its face, this writing appears to be an offer to purchase advertising space in The National *294Buyers’ Guide, published by the appellants’ predecessors. The writing further contains a recital that the offerer promises to pay the sum of $275.00…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dallas Farm MacHinery Company v. ReavesTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Bates v. SouthgateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Land Finance Corp. v. Sherwin Electric Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1929
  4. Holcomb & Hoke Manufacturing Co. v. Auto Interurban Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Producers Grocery Co. v. Blackwell Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API