Kucher v. Scott
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered January 8, 1916, in favor of the defendants, dismissing an action to cancel a mortgage, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
— The plaintiffs, being the owners of certain real property in the city of Seattle which was covered by two mortgages, claiming that one of the mortgages was invalid, but not knowing which one, brought this action for the purpose of securing the cancellation of the void mortgage, whichever one it might be. The defendants are, respectively, the owners of the two mortgages. The trial resulted in a judgment adverse to the plaintiffs’ contention. From this judgment, the appeal is prosecuted.
The facts which gave rise to the litigation are substantially these: For many years, A. Robinson & Company…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Merchants' Bank v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Ward v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Hollinshead v. John Stuart & Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
- Lester v. SnyderColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
- Stansbury v. EmbreyTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bjorkstam v. Federal Land BankWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Ross v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Huismann v. AlthoffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Koppler v. BuggeWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Burtt v. SchoeningWashington Supreme Court · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.